Ohdsd0sd09

Queer/gay views (When I say gay or Queer I also mean Lesbian except when noted otherwise)

I support one's right to follow their conscience in matters of sexuality

I also love the "Be gay, do crime" slogan. That slogan is anti neoliberal and anti authoritarian and it implies that gays doing criminal and incivil acts may be necessary to obtain equal rights for gays everywhere (since being gay is still criminalized in many places around the world)

Queer Anarchists can trace this type of bold method back to the Stonewall riots where gay protestors back then used the same methods to try to obtain equal rights for gays

I also support the Max Stirner inspired brand of Queer Anarchism . I support their notion of (and embracing) radical individualism that is influenced by individual philosophers like Max Stirner.

In particular I support Queer Anarchists using Max Stirner’s non-systematic approach, radicalism and direct action. I like how queer anarchists organized and played a major role in the WTO protests and anti-globalization movement.

While I am pro LGBTQ, I feel that LGBTQ rights are used by neoliberals and neocons to justify the US and NATO’s imperialism and those neoliberals and neocons are wrong to do that. Imperialism is wrong

For example, Zionists and neoliberals and neocons criticize Palestine for being ‘homophobic’ and for their non gay friendly laws. The neoliberals and neocons use that to justify helping he occupiers (Israel) to oppress (ymmv) the Palestinians. I sort of echo this article

There is no liberation without LGBTQ liberation. However, neoliberals forcing pro LGBTQ policies on homophobic countries is bad because it will make the LGBTQ movement be associated with western imperialism.

This will be counterproductive and cause anti LGBTQ sentiment due to the LGBTQ movement wrongly being associated with Imperialism. This will basically violate the West’s do no harm principal in ways the West never imagined in the global south.

Let’s hope the US adheres to a strict Do no harm principle so maybe this US LGBTQ imperialism won’t backfire on LGBTQ people and won’t be so blatant

Instead we (the left) should work with our global south allies while accepting they might be homophobic at times.

We can point out to those homophobes it is wrong to be homophobic in our spaces, but we can’t and should not force them to be better while we do show them that we ( the left) will work with them to fight imperialism and that we accept the LGBTQ community etc

Being LGBTQ was acceptable and common in the Americas (like Second Spirit in First Nations pre Canada) and Asia before European imperialism and colonialism criminalized LGBTQ acts in those countries and thus set off centuries of hetereosexist , Anti LGBTQ laws, cultural views and tragedies (tragedies like the brutal persecution and oppression of Queer people in Europe in the 1930s and 1940s). So we must defeat Imperialism and Colonialism once and for all to liberate the LGBTQ . See here for a similar point

The whole concept of the bourgeois dividing people by their sexual orientation ('straight', 'queer i.e gay', 'bisexual') is what they use to enslave people of all sexual orientations. We need to abolish labeling people by sexual orientation, and stop labeling sexual orientations blur

This is because things like :queer fluidity, queer curiosity, queer flexibility, hetero fluidity, hetero curiosity, hetero flexibility, bi fluidity, bi curiosity, bi flexibility, gender non conforming and their relationships and similar post sexual orientation things are becoming more and more common.

Because of that and the fact that the lines between sexual orientations are becoming less and less defined and different, there is no need to label people as 'straight' 'queer i.e gay' ,'bi sexual' etc

Moreover, educating gays bi sexuals etc about what I wrote above, can help them realize they don't have to be Pidgeon holed into one LGBTQ+ box and can be free to explore whatever is best for them. This will make people of all sexual orientations productive members of our society creating a working class conscious.

No more, will gays or bi sexual people have to beer the stigma of being labeled 'queer/gay' or 'bi sexual' (this link expands on that Post Heterosexual/Heteronormative patriarchy uptopia world), since there will no clear boundary between the many types of sexual orientations, which are all becoming less and less defined. This will send a message to the bourgeoisie that them dividing us by sexual orientation has ended.

This is because on the social level, the reappropriation of life, in addition to its full reappropriation on the individual level, people of all sexual orientations will have stopped identifying essentially in terms of their sexual preference social identities.

This is also basically Queer neutrality/queer anti-identitarianism which I support (Like the gay shame movement, coalitions of queer neutrality like Queer Nation set aside their identity differences in order to team up against assimilationist movements). Think of it as an undoing of the structural logics of the indexical trace and the rhetorical apostrophe

For example, the band Queen, in the 2018 film Bohemian Rhapsody when someone asks front man Freddy Mercury (played by Rami Malek), “What makes Queen any different from all of the other wannabe rock stars I meet?” Freddy Mercury responds,

“I’ll tell you what it is. We are four misfits who don’t belong together, playing to the other misfits: the outcasts right at the back of the room who are pretty sure they don’t belong either. We belong to them”

This depiction of the queer community as not belonging and yet belonging to those who do not belong is anti-identitarian because it crosses genders/genres and interrupts the boundaries of communication.

More from Freddy Mercury “We’ll mix genres, we’ll cross boundaries, we’ll speak in bloody tongues if we want to” (Bohemian Rhapsody). Queer neutrality is supposed to be a condition of relation without any determinate representational or indexical tie, especially the ties of social categories, associational boundaries, and personal identities that shape conventional relations.

John Paul Ricco states a queer-neutral anti-methodology in his The Logic of the Lure (2002) book, where he writes “What if we neither began nor ended with identity? In the end, what if we were to substitute something like a cruising ground for an epistemological ground”

The above changes will liberate all homophobes, biphobes and heterophobes from their homophobia, biphobia and heterophobia . The above changes will also help people not end up like this former liberal by making it impossible to be homophobic, biphobic or heterephobic in the first place

Judith/Jack Halberstam’s Queer Art of Failure (2011) builds upon antisocial impersonality by further developing an idea of queer impersonality as “radically passive masochism,” that Queer people can relate to one another in their anticlimactic and destructive nonrelations to them/selves.

Halberstam reinvigorates the cruising fetish for Queer people by making the utility of getting lost over finding their way attractive, and so Queer people should conjure a Benjaminian stroll or a situationist flow, an ambulatory journey through the unplanned, unexpected, improvised, and surprising

I believe that queer utopianism can rely on anti-identitarianism to turn humanism into a disruption of the ossification of the human disruption of the ossification of the human which is why I support that

However, the idpol of intersectionality is not easily dismissed by queer neutrality theorists . After all the first chapter of the Queer Neutrality book notes that even the English gender comes not just via the French genre but it also comes via the Latin genus, as in kind, type, class, set, group, or race, and Sigmund Freud used the German term Geschlecht, which means sex, family, or race.

Here are some views on the Black feminist Standpoint theory critique of Queer Neutrality/Queer theory and how Afro Pessimism provides a better alternative to the Black Feminist standpoint theory's limited alternative to Queer Neutrality/Queer theory

In the context of these problems with queer theory, Patricia Hill Collins’I echo every point that Suzanna Danuta Walters made in the II. BEYOND GUNS AND TAFFETA chapter of her book ‘The Few, The Proud, The Gays: Don't Ask, Don't Tell and the Trap of Tolerance’

I'm absolutely not happy when Western corporations use rainbow symbols to pretend that they support solidarity with LGBTQ people while said corporations support imperialism and neocolonialism like in pride month. I am against non LGBTQ people displaying pride colors in their social media profiles and especially at home. I am against sports leagues having pride nights and having their teams display pride colors.

That commodifies LGBTQ people and is wrong. They only pretend to support LGBTQ people. I echo what Suzanna Dunata Walters said in the piece here. I also echo this meme and this post on this. Also see a similar point in this link along with the related book The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism and this meme here for more

I also don’t like pride in part for the same reason I don’t like public holidays, spring break etc; I don’t like annual rituals shoved down our throats by corporations and the media ,and the capitalist commodification of love, family and morals

When we destroy the heterosexual patriarchy/heteronormativity naturally in a non hierarchal manner it will naturally help gays to blend in without notice since sexual orientation wouldn’t matter at that point

Queer Theory holds that our gender and sexual identities are a fiction that is produced by discourses and oppressive power in our society: a learned performance. What does this idea mean for the liberation struggle? Is Queer Theory compatible with Marxism?

In this talk, recorded at this year's International Marxist University, Yola Kipcak from Der Funke (Austrian section of the IMT) tackles these issues and explains the position of Marxists towards Queer Theory and the struggle against oppression

https://www.marxist.com/marxism-vs-queer-theory.htm The Queer Theory believers that everyone worldwide has always done the exact opposite of what the Straight White Man does

.If we make the US and rest of the world like this, we will no longer have overkill idpol (or even halfway overkill idpol) or bigotry and our world will totally be free and equal. This will liberate sexist, homophobes and transphobes from their bigotry and prevent people from ending up like this former liberal on these issues

I support that (Queer Theory) and gender acceleration . Gender Acceleration and the Queer Theory would make the logic of gender broken to the point where someone can freely and safely come out as trans without having to worry about being ostracised from society.

In the Judeo Christian bible, it is often said (by Immanuel) “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” He points to the disciples and says, “Here are my mother and my brothers. For whoever does the will of my father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.”

I support abolishing the nuclear family as the norm. This would lead more people being able to find equal alternatives to the nuclear family

While I am ok if this naturally leads to the nuclear family being completely abolished , I am against abolishing the nuclear family by coercion or force (since abolishing the nuclear family completely by coercion or force is authoritarianism and a violation of non aggression principle, personal autonomy and other Left Libertarianism and Anarchism core values),

In the above ‘post nuclear family societies’ I would be fine with families still being traditional if they voluntarily choose to be that way (no one would stop them from being like that, since Left Libertarianism and Anarchism are the opposite of Authoritarianism)

In the above ‘post nuclear family societies’ , I would be fine with people still getting married if they wanted to do so voluntarily (see relation section way below)

Peter Kropotkin would never support completely abolishing the nuclear family by force

Abolishing the Nuclear family completely coercion or by force goes against Karl Marx's distinction that he made between personal property as your own stuff, and "private property" as code for the privatized/enclosed means of producing goods and services.

As a self-respecting Left Libertarian/Anarchist, I would never demand the complete abolition of something (the nuclear family) that my family, friends and neighbors participate in freely

I would never demand to completely abolish a thing like the nuclear family which is at the core of so many cultures' daily lives

I also concede that, marriage, family, and childhood, all wrongfully or rightfully have a solid universal basis across many cultures. The form changes, but the core remains. To try to abolish any of these by (at least by coercion or force) instead of only abolishing them as the norm is to attempt to abolish a core piece of humanity.

To completely abolish the nuclear family by coercion or force, would be some corrosive heirarchical elitism. I just want a society that elevates other options as equal alternatives to the nuclear family, and to abolish the nuclear family as the norm.

So while, I'm no fan of the nuclear family, I'm not going to judge people for being more comfortable with that sort of lifestyle. But I would also more than ideally want decentralized free association to also replace the family unit

If through this abolishing the nuclear family as a norm , the nuclear family was eventually naturally completely abolished, it would be problematic but I would be ok with that and it still wouldn’t be too radical: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/want-to-dismantle-capitalism-abolish-the-family/. Also see this

I support the Queer Theory (see this related concept for more) , This also plays into my Queer theory views

The Queer Theory challenges the notion that heterosexual desire is ‘normal’.

The Queer theory explores and challenges how we perpetrate gender- and sex-based binaries, and its goal is to undo hierarchies and to fight against social inequalities.

The Queer Theory can be seen as a site of ‘collective contestation’. Some people suggest that the term ‘queer’ should never be ‘fully owned, but always and only redeployed, twisted, queered from a prior usage and in the direction of urgent and expanding political purposes’.

This flexibility allows for the consistent readjustment of the queer theory to accommodate the experiences of people who face marginalisation and discrimination on account of their sexuality and gender'.

This chapter from Michael Simmons book Neutrality in the Queer theory uses Afro Pessimism to critique the Queer theory and to touch on the relationship and intersection between Afro Pessimism and the Queer theory .

This chapter from that same book criticizes the Queer theory using Queer of Color critique. Michael Simmons in that book shows the parallel to the way race forms a stumbling block for queer neutrality while also showing how Leo Bersani’s and Lee Edelman’s impersonality runs into a representational tokenism within the Queer theory

This why I also support Xenofeminism since it is a way to achieve this

Xenofeminism uses tech to abolish gender, dislodging gender from ‘power’ and allows feminists to use the master’s tools to rebuild life. This also has an-anti naturalist element to it

From the Xenofeminist handbook:

"XF is vehemently anti-naturalist. Essentialist naturalism reeks of theology–the sooner it is exorcised, the better.". "We want neither clean hands nor beautiful souls, neither virtue nor terror. We want superior forms of corruption.". "Let a hundred sexes bloom!". "Our lot is cast with technoscience, where nothing is so sacred that it cannot be reengineered and transformed so as to widen our aperture of freedom, extending to gender and the human." "Hormones hack into gender systems"

The Queer theory links universalization with queer . The preference for the term “queer” over the term “lesbian” and “gay” “represents, a bold impulse of generalization since it rejects a minoritizing logic of toleration or simple political interest representation in favor of a more thorough resistance to regimes of the normal.

While queer theory has been a critical and theoretical discourse that is dedicated to questioning, resisting, and refusing the binary logics and structures that dominant understandings of gender and sexuality have been shaped, never the less, the virtual majority of this discourse continues to be expressed in terms of sameness and difference—a commanding binary structural logic that is especially potent in its ability to exclude, hierarchize, and totalize.

I am against changing the official definition of Lesbian from woman who is attracted to another women to a non man attracted to another non man. John Hopkins and company are wrongly trying to erase Lesbianism just like Matt Walsh and are trying to do to Transgender people. Johns Hopkins is Lesphobic for doing that.

See this link for more (⚠)

I support Lesbian NrX

I am against Lesbian Erasure. It's wrong for people to try to get Lesbians to transition to males, gender non conforming or to become fluid. The whole concept of girlfags and guydykes means there should be solidarity between cis Lesbians and Transgender people, not division. Being a cisgender Lesbian is NOT transmisogynist and anyone who says otherwise is a Lesphobe and bigot (I echo this Tweet thread on it)

Lesbian erasure is wrong, hypocritical and against the values of our society. I want Lesbians to get more visibility within the LGBTQ movement, and be treated as equal to Homosexuals. There is nothing wrong with women being Lesbians. I oppose the 'cotton ceiling' and the pressure on lesbians to have sex with men.

Queer Neutrality unites Homosexuals and Lesbians and prevents Lesbian Erasure. Why Queer?, Queer, unlike gay, does not mean male. Furthermore when spoken to other gays and lesbians it is a way of suggesting they close ranks and forget (temporarily) their individual differences because they face a more insidious common enemy.

Queer neutrality expands from a gender-neutral coalition into an identity-neutral or impersonal coalition, with this expansion destabilizing the boundaries of the umbrella term “queer” in so much that it subsumes in a coalition of any non-normative identities (at the time) which as mentioned above includes lesbian, gay, but also bisexual, multiple ts (like transsexual, transvestite, transgender) and an inconsistent (and contested) combo of some of the following sexual and/or gender identities:

Q (Queer Heterosexuality), Q (questioning), Q (queer as a vague non-heterosexual identity), I (intersex), A (asexual), A (allied heterosexual), F (fetish – often shorthand for BDSM), U (undecided – replaces Q/questioning to make the palatable acronym QUILTBAG), 2S (two spirits), P (pansexual), G (girlfags and guydykes) etc

Queer neutrality stresses the interrelatedness of different, and occasional conflicting, communities and thus emphasizes the need to combine forces in our various antihomophobic and antisexist endeavors

However about the term Queer. Outside personhood. Lee Edelman writes, “queerness can never define an identity; it can only ever disturb one” . Again, “queerness could never constitute an authentic or substantive identity, but only a structural position determined by the imperative of figuration”

These are the causes that Edelman gives in support of his claim that queerness attains its ethical value exactly as far as it accedes to that place (of abjection conveyed in the stigma) accepting its figural status as resistance to the feasibility of the social while insisting on the inextricability of such resistance from all social structures.

Tim Dean molds his impersonal ethics of contact that is found in cruising culture in his Unlimited Intimacies: Reflections on the Subculture of Barebacking book where he writes “The alternative to what I’m calling the politics of identification is an impersonal ethics in which one cares about others even when one cannot see anything of oneself in them”

Homosexualism is the opposite of Patriarchy since patriarchal societies do not consider homosexuals as men. According to our binary society, only a woman can like men. So those radlib wokeists who wrongly say that the LGBTQ movement is 'patriarchal', in relation to gays/queers, they literally have it mixed up since the opposite is true.

This means those woke radlibs, besides being transphobic are also

I respond to the woke radlibs smearing the LGBTQ movement as 'overtly white' in this post here

I am against Heterophobia. There is nothing wrong or oppressing about being Heterosexual. If you are Heterophobic, stop focusing on that petty thing and focus on what matters. See here for more

Heterosexuality is NOT rape and only mentally hanidcapped, woke hetereophobic bigots would say that. Over 95 percent of the US, Canada, Australia, Europe, UK do not think that heteroesexuality is rape.

I hope that the LGBTQ community attracts more libertarians to it cause. It is worrisome that the only people who are standing up for freedom of speech in the community are rightoids. It's only recently since the mid 2010s that we've seen more political or thought diversity from such communities.

The SJWs have gotten away with planting their idelogies in the community and its only causing more division in our society. Other than seeing an amicable solution between gays and religious people upon equal marriage, it has instead become nothing but a petty mud slinging fest with trivial disputes over things like wedding cakes and pizza. Having celebrities such as Ellen Page enflame such tensions does not help at all.

Such division and intolerance on both sides could cause religious people who were already homoskeptic to become full on homophobes

Every gay or bisexual person from Earth in our reality past present or future has zillions of clones in alternate realities who are straight for their entire lives from birth to death.

Every straight person from Earth in our reality past present or future has zillions of clones in alternate realities who are gay for their entire lives from birth to death

If I was in an alternate reality where there was like 6 or more biological sexes of people on Earth (that were as opposite of male and female as male and female are opposite of each other), instead of just two biological sexes, then in those realities I would do the following. I would in those realities endorse and advocate for gays to at least become bisexual (but ideally gender fluid, gay curious or heteroflexible) since there would be more biological sexes for gays to choose from then just male/female.

I believe that nearly all gays form Earth would be at least bisexual (but ideally gender fluid, gay curious or heteroflexible) if there were like 6 or more biological sexes of people on Earth (that were as opposite of male and female as male and female are opposite of each other), instead of just two biological sexes

In those alternate realities I would say “I feel in my conscious that in this alternate reality gays should have the same type of bonds and relationships with people of their own sex that David and Jonathan had with each other in the bible instead of being gay though I am fine with people being gender fluid, gay curious or heteroflexible" (and for females a female version of that)

⠠⠍⠽⠀⠠⠁⠞⠀⠓⠑⠜⠞⠀⠧⠊⠑⠺⠎⠀⠕⠝⠀⠎⠁⠍⠑⠀⠎⠑⠭⠀⠍⠜⠗⠊⠁⠛⠑⠀⠉⠁⠝⠀⠃⠑⠀⠋⠳⠝⠙⠀~~⠓⠻⠑⠲~~

Search This Blog

Sounstageisofblog

Ohdsd0sd09

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DKalkewlk

Polewkooweiow